. . . by proposals to cut taxes. Fiscally, such proposals are dangerously irresponsible. The U.S. debt is huge, and the annual deficit is adding to it daily. Increasing proportions of our debt are owned by China and other countries. We need to reduce the annual deficit, just to reduce the huge current interest payments on the debt, which crowd out other beneficial forms of government spending.
As much as the taxpayers might wish for tax cuts, those tax cuts would only add to the nation’s future fiscal woes. The claim that a tax cut might raise revenue is counterintuitive, pandering, and certainly not supported by any recent economic history. President Reagan enacted the biggest tax cut in history at the time, and the deficit ballooned. He also had to backtrack several times with tax increases to fix the problem. President Clinton raised taxes, which was followed by one of the strongest sustained recoveries in our nation’s history (and years of U.S. budget surplus). President Bush cut taxes again, which was followed by deficits that exceeded those of the Reagan Administration. It’s only logical, face it, that tax cuts lead to deficits!
Given the current huge U.S. deficit, the only responsible course is some combination of spending cuts, continued borrowing during a period of deficit reduction, and selected tax increases. We have choices to face, about who should suffer from those spending cuts and who should face the tax increases, but none of THAT debate can deny the fundamental reality that somebody has to suffer from spending cuts, and somebody has to face tax increases.